Posts Tagged ‘male perspective’

Cock Beautiful (2)

February 10, 2018

I adore beautiful penises. My blog is a thorough promotion of the male genitals (and the male sexual reaction 😉 ). Yet saying „I adore beautiful penises“ does imply that there is variety among the objects of adoration!

There sure is and we all know that. Yet as a kid and young adolescent I did not know!! Or rather I was not aware of the fact that penises can be pretty much different. I may not have cared that much (as I´m not gay), but all I was aware of was the common knowledge that penises may be of different sizes (locker room experience, pre-net ages). With the internet I became disabused!

The realm of the male genitals (penises and scrotums) is exciting and fascinating. I wrote about it before and quite early in this blogs life. – Bring to mind that every penis (even more so in combination with its scrotum) is unique! Just like fingerprints and irises are unique. Although penises are basically similar, the differences can be immense! Yes, there are a lot of look-alikes around, still every specimen is unique.

This is because a penis is composed of different anatomical parts, like the two erectile bodies and the glans, which are subject to a highly variable appearance. Consider the smoothness and veining of the shaft, the foreskin option and the pubic hair. Add the scrotum (obeying the same rule of variability) and you know that you never know what to expect (with a new encounter).

And if this wasn´t enough we find the male genitals provided with the ever stunning shape-shifting ability! This all is mightily arousing when you think about it!

Speaking of beauty, which is in the eye of the beholder and a matter of taste, I realize that I like those penises the most which look similar to my own cock! I most adore the looks featuring something like a prettier, optimized version of my own specimen, basically just a larger Doppelganger! This does not seem too exciting, does it. I wonder if sexual orientation plays a part in prefered likeability? That is, if gay men rather adore a different penis-design apart from their own (comments are welcome)?

This musing is, once again, very objectified and kind of abstract, but male genitals are such a seductive topic. I tried my best to address it with background information throughout this blog. In real life, unless you solely meet cocks and balls via glory-holing, there is always a person „behind“ a penis and a scrotum. Mostly we deal with the man first, before we get down focusing at his genitals. And as I said, we never know what to expect. Generally it will be hard to correctly anticipate the size and design of a penis (and scrotum) from the stature of a given man:

The same principle certainly then works vice versa! If you were encountering penises via glory-holes you can not assume the appearance of the owner, it´s even much catchier this way around!

Look for the owner here!

Look for the owner here!

If you are inclined to, do enjoy the sight and reaction of male genitals, whether via photos, artwork, video or for real, penises and scrotums remain to be eternally fascinating!

ArtVantage (2) – Mandala

December 17, 2017

One definite advantage in pictorial and decorative arts is the option to create visual compositions which follow a pattern or grid, – keyword mandala.

Wikipedia is defining a mandala this way: A mandala (literally „circle“) is a spiritual and ritual symbol in Hinduism and Buddhism, representing the universe. In common use, mandala has become a generic term for any diagram, chart or geometric pattern that represents the cosmos metaphysically or symbolically; a microcosm of the universe.

With this post I want to hint you to some beautifully composed images, which could be seen as mandalas for the sexual realm. Nothing more appropriate than creating this kind of artwork as illustration for a contemporary edition of the famous Kama Sutra (sex) manual.

The Kama Sutra is an ancient Indian Hindu text written by Vatsyayana. It is widely considered to be the standard work on human sexual behaviour in Sanskrit literature. (quote Wikipedia)

It is quite obvious that any illustration for this groundbreaking seven-part work, which originally was issued without any images (!), could ideally be a composition representing symmetry and/or following a pattern. For both artistic achievements (mandala & text in this case) not only share the same cultural background, they also perfectly complement each other content-wise.

Even the fun and comic approach of Benito Jacovitti (whose collection of hilarious sketches were published in an artbook titled Kamasutra) can be regarded as a mandala, a circular symbol representing the universe. The universe of sexual union in this case.

Now, enjoy the very beautiful drawings by Georges Pichard. He „seriously“ illustrated but one edition of the Kama Sutra and generated these sort of mandalas, of which each also represents a microcosm (of an aspect) in the universe of human sexuality (click to enlarge):

 

 

 

 

Featured artists in chronological order: Benito Jacovitti, Georges Pichard.

ArtVantage (1) – Masculine

October 14, 2017

Nothing better than to start this new series with an homage to a great artist! Actually I did not plan to, but the release of a movie about his life this year (check out the dates here) gave me the idea.

I am talking about Touko Valio Laaksonen, better known by his pseudonym Tom of Finland, of whom cultural historian Joseph W. Slade said that he was the “most influential creator of gay pornographic images”!

Indeed he was and his style is very distinct and recognizable. Please read about his life at this Wikipedia page and do follow the links to his art-work pages noted there!

Also check about the movie I mentioned at this Wiki-page, – mind you it aint no porno, but a revealing biopic!

Toukos impact on the scene was profound. Many artists after him dared to create uninhibited gay themed pornographic art which celebrated the very masculine male: full of muscle, stamina and xtra-large genitalia!

I offer you a small collection of art(ists) in „Toms footsteps“:

Tom was drawing men clean-shaved! Following artists implemented more than the obligatory moustache!

Toms genre preference has been hunks in uniform and leather boots. Yet he also featured Cowboys, Sailors and Construction Workers. As do contemporary artists, for example:

Toms men have been equal in size, looks and endowment (when presented in groups of two or more). Later artists seem to favour the senior/junior arrangement:

Certainly the art of Tom of Finland paved the way for numerous gay themed comics to emerge, telling hard-core stories in every imaginable way:

Featured artists in chronological order:
Joseph, Just A. Buoy, Pan Hanks, Valentine, Josman.

Note: Click pic to get enlarged version!

Do You Burst or Do You Spill?

September 17, 2017

This blog explains and shows the diversity of the ejaculatory performance in men. One aspect touches the mode in which semen is initially ejected, beginning with a smooth flow, or shooting out all of a sudden. So, this post addresses the two basic take-off possibilities of ejaculation.

Among all those previous contributions with similar questions on the subject (like here, here and here), this entry concerns the most alterable ejaculatory feature. Hence you could answer the headline question with Yes and Yes!

Although the ejaculatory reflex lets our muscles (responsible for cum-ejection) perform involuntarily, we do have the opportunity to strengthen and control these muscles to a certain extent. This leaves us a choice of consciously deciding whether we want to release our milk in a flow before the inevitable reflex takes over and has our systems pump out the stored juices or if we want to burst after PONR.

This early double-post here and here tells you all about the parameters of the visible ejaculation and how shooting next to spilling cum can gain a meaning for the witness and the ejaculator.

What you read in the following passage briefly puts your focus at the ejaculatory take-off, an advanced point-of-view after you found awareness about the fact of the two modes and the sensations tied to them.

Bursting is a more „natural“ way of taking-off, because you automatically will try to hold back your ejection after you have passed PONR.

You do not need to learn this, you can and will do clench your BC and PC and associated muscles until they need to give in to the inevitable reflex = pulsing (i.e. ejaculating your semen).

Almost literally exploding with cum is always an awesome sensation as you built up the internal gland-pressure impatiently waiting for the reliefing moment to eventually gain your own permission (for PONR) and bursting open thru your cock!

A more refined way of (softly) releasing your milk requires a bit of practise. Because you need to keep your muscles (mainly BC and PC) stay relaxed while slowly approaching PONR (this is a controlled way of triggering the ejaculatory reflex).

The release is a mix between emission and ejaculation. I regard this as another kind of ejaculatory climax for which I coined the expression emisjaculation. Read about it in this post here! I personally find this kind of climax most rewarding! Check out an analysis of an emisjaculation here!

It is great to be able to alter certain aspects of our ejaculatory release, to experiment with the way we cum and chose how we want to experience our climax at a given situation.

Last not least you may like to obtain brief clips demonstrating the different ways of the ejaculatory take-off.

See a young lad beginning to ejaculate with a sudden cum-burst, pumping his semen in powerful spurts. His ejaculations seem out of control, a very hot scene!

This guy shows a controlled release, another emisjaculation in which his spilling follows a considerable outflow of his milk. He continues to spill three more times in a soft-pumping fashion!

A worthwhile analytical clip of an emisjaculation (part of a larger clip, with sound i.e. moaning) is this one here (already published on this blog).

Please participate in the poll:

What is your ejection take-off mode, and which do you favor?
(polls)