Posts Tagged ‘scrotum’

The Ventral Cock-Image

August 12, 2018

I hope you share my never tiring enthusiasm for the human penis!? I published quite some posts addressing cock as well as balls/scrotum, both never-failing to amaze the connossoire.

If not in reality, we have plenty of opportunities to gaze upon male genitals via the uncounted imagery surrounding us (mainly net-based). We do notice the differences among the organs themselves in all those pics while the stock of photography offers us a multitude point-of-views in which a penis is captured. Here either the better quality by photographic skill or a situational related detriment becomes instantly obvious.

Now concerning the visual aesthetics of a pictured penis I believe that the point-of-view of the beholder is very important. Personally I really love such an angle:

This depicts the ideal presentation of a penis. Proud he stands showing us:

  • the size and shape of his head
  • the blissed triangle with its frenulum
  • his foreskin (or none at all)
  • the size and curvature of his shaft
  • the size and design of the smaller erectile body, the Corpus spongiosum
  • the size and condition of his scrotum and thus the size of his testicles (best when shaved).

I think that an excited penis and scrotum are displayed most beautifully in such an image!

The next best stiff-cock-presentation, in my humble opinion, comes with the „ventral image“, showing a penis accurately from below. I really enjoy portrayals taken from this point-of-view. The information about a male´s genitals is very similar to the listing above:

  • the size and shape of the helmet is less obvious but still pretty much assessable
  • the blissed triangle with its frenulum is caught spot on
  • his foreskin (or none at all) is obvious
  • the size and design of his shaft are obvious
  • the curvature of the shaft, however, is missed unless it is bent sideways
  • the size and design of the Corpus spongiosum are nicely exposed
  • the size and condition of his scrotum and thus the size of his testicles are in front of you!

  

What are the options? Let´s take a look. The “dorsal image”, showing a penis from above, is quite disappointing. We miss a lot of genital information here! And the scrotum is a complete loss, so to speak:

The most unfortunate penis-portrait would be an angle with a dick pointing straight at the camera:

Here we get a top view of the helmet and maybe part of the scrotum, the other aspects remain guess-work!

A penis shown from the side is quite nice and the point-of-view is much related to our ideal angle, still we may miss essential information (magic triangle, Corpus spongiosum, testicles):

All this information-talk is due to the fact that we deal with two-dimensional imagery. Moving pictures are highly advanced for gaining a good impression quickly, but that after all is another art form. Maybe 3D-images would offer an exciting alternative? Well, get out your cyan/magenta glasses and check for yourselves:

At last a closing statement. There are really a lot of ways to capture male genitals in beautiful photography, given all the angles possible plus the fact that penises and scrotums are true shapeshifters.

Still, the hottest presentation of male genitalia we can delight in is the angle initially proposed. My opinion:

Penises And Us

May 27, 2018

We live in a world of double standards and parallel realms when it comes to sex. On one hand we lead relationships with one partner for an extended period of time (sometimes with a lover on the side) based on emotional affection, on the other hand our bodies and their sexual attributes are often highly objectified and we enjoy this purely physical approach!

Next to „tits and ass“ among other „parts“, literally from hair to feet (with the female), it also concerns penises and scrotums (the latter less so) with the male.

But how important are penises for men and women? How and why does a random person (no matter the sex) value and cherish a cock more or less?

I believe the parallel realms exist (always have been) because we (human individuals) either apply emotion (heart and soul) to the other (as a whole) prioritizingly, or just want pure sex to meet excitement, release and satisfaction without emotional bonding… and deliberately so.

But humans are always both: their bodies and parts of their bodies are tools and yet they own a heart and soul and thus develop emotional bonds towards other humans, sometimes unwillingly.

That´s why the attitude towards a penis can be very different, even in one and the same person. It depends upon whether the given penis is owned by the loved partner or whether a penis appears as an abstract, being a highly objectified tool then.

In the first case you may love that penis unconditionally, as is, no questions asked. That penis shall serve a double-function in the sex act, (A) for the owner being the gateway to his experiencing himself as sexual being in a satisfying manner, thus being more of a tool you use to please your lover. And yet sure enough (B) his beloved penis being the source of all the sensations it generates in you, the lover, physically and psychologically.

In the second case the penis remains a concept, a pure tool existent to please your urges (toward the concept). The penis is the object of desire, it needs to work properly, it ought to be spectacular, it ought to satisfy you, the owner is of less importance. You love cock for cocks sake and you are in power. Emotions may only arise towards the given penis if it touches your individual taste and preferences you developed for your image of an ideal penis. The utmost realisation of this kind of penislove in the real world is the practise of glory-holing.

Now, every man owns a penis that he (hopefully) loves unconditionally. Whether men want to experience other men´s cocks is a matter of open-mindedness and sexual orientation – still, the same rules for the parallel realms apply (being in love with the penis-owner vs craving cock for cocks sake).

Women only know penises thru encounters and images of whatever source (the internet is an eye-opener for sure). Whether they develop an urge for cock in pursuing penis encounters the objectified kind (keyword glory-hole) may be a matter of individual attitude (toward sexuality) and social situation. Then, yet not exclusively, „size likely matters“. However, ejaculatory performance may outweigh the size-question? Only remember, one can not have it all, such combinations (big cock + big cum) are rare and/or access is most probably limited:

When Big Balls Ruled

March 31, 2018

You might have seen photos/clips of guys with scrotums the size of a grapefruit. I know there are forums around for those of us who are into that kind of fetish.

Now, a fraction of men displaying such huge balls are wired differently inside, i.e. their reproductive system is built in another way than the huge majority of men.

Why? Because they inherited their anatomy from the Neanderthals! This is a very specific topic not well investigated and not broadly published other than within a closed scientific community. I think it is as scientifically intriguing as it is hot!

Fact is that some Neanderthals interbred with modern humans about 47,000 – 65,000 years ago. And about 20% of the Neanderthal genome has been found introgressed in the modern human population. Some of the genes are believed to be responsible for the differently organized glandular allocation for the secretion of fluids that mix into semen.

Compare, modern human males are organized like this:

Testicles and epididymae cover sperm-production while seminal vesicles and the prostate produce the juices which become semen (carrying sperm) at ejaculation.

But Neanderthals were allegedly built like this:

Here the epididymae have been the sole glands producing and maturing sperm, while the testicles produced and stored the liquid which was to become semen together with the contribution of the prostate (there is no difference in function and size between Neanderthals and modern humans).

The difference seems to be minor, but the effect is huge (and so exciting)!

Many people today still think (wishfully?) that cum is produced in the balls. Not anymore, only with the Neanderthals this has been the case, apparently! The then different function of the testicles also means that with the onset of arousal -thus beginning of cum production– the balls of an Neanderthal man were visibly growing!

Furthermore the function of the scrotum to elevate the testicles closer to the body when nearing PONR was presumably non-existent! The design of the reproductive system of the Neanderthals is suggesting that the males will have tried to impregnate many females at a single sexual mating call.

This also implies that Neanderthals must have been void of MRP, so that they repeatedly were able to ejaculate or alternatively could have coaxed emissions by squeezing their balls!?

With the scientifically examined few men carrying Neanderthal DNA the above mentioned features were confirmed! I also would like to quote the scientists who had been working on the subject, Margulis & Sagan:

Large testes and big penises are advantages only under conditions of widespread sexual promiscuity. Among our closest relatives the great apes, only male chimpanzees have testicles more prodigious than those of men. And chimps, with their big, heavy testicles, are more sexually promiscuous than humans. […] Like an auto race won by the driver whose sponsoring company can afford to provide him with the most souped-up car, the male with the best-timed copulation, most far-reaching ejaculation, and biggest testicular “engine” able to produce the greatest quantity of sperm tended to win the “game” of impregnation. (Mystery Dance, On the Evolution of Human Sexuality: Summit Books, New York (1991) pp. 33)

Watch one of those contemporary special guys cumming! He usually edges until his balls are massively filled with his produce before he makes himself unload in spectacular fountains of jizz:

This is a hoax! This is all a fictitious piece of fake news, an Easter-Extra which additionally serves April 1 this year! 😉 Don´t be fooled, but be aroused and celebrate your balls – Happy Easter!

Cock Beautiful (2)

February 10, 2018

I adore beautiful penises. My blog is a thorough promotion of the male genitals (and the male sexual reaction 😉 ). Yet saying „I adore beautiful penises“ does imply that there is variety among the objects of adoration!

There sure is and we all know that. Yet as a kid and young adolescent I did not know!! Or rather I was not aware of the fact that penises can be pretty much different. I may not have cared that much (as I´m not gay), but all I was aware of was the common knowledge that penises may be of different sizes (locker room experience, pre-net ages). With the internet I became disabused!

The realm of the male genitals (penises and scrotums) is exciting and fascinating. I wrote about it before and quite early in this blogs life. – Bring to mind that every penis (even more so in combination with its scrotum) is unique! Just like fingerprints and irises are unique. Although penises are basically similar, the differences can be immense! Yes, there are a lot of look-alikes around, still every specimen is unique.

This is because a penis is composed of different anatomical parts, like the two erectile bodies and the glans, which are subject to a highly variable appearance. Consider the smoothness and veining of the shaft, the foreskin option and the pubic hair. Add the scrotum (obeying the same rule of variability) and you know that you never know what to expect (with a new encounter).

And if this wasn´t enough we find the male genitals provided with the ever stunning shape-shifting ability! This all is mightily arousing when you think about it!

Speaking of beauty, which is in the eye of the beholder and a matter of taste, I realize that I like those penises the most which look similar to my own cock! I most adore the looks featuring something like a prettier, optimized version of my own specimen, basically just a larger Doppelganger! This does not seem too exciting, does it. I wonder if sexual orientation plays a part in prefered likeability? That is, if gay men rather adore a different penis-design apart from their own (comments are welcome)?

This musing is, once again, very objectified and kind of abstract, but male genitals are such a seductive topic. I tried my best to address it with background information throughout this blog. In real life, unless you solely meet cocks and balls via glory-holing, there is always a person „behind“ a penis and a scrotum. Mostly we deal with the man first, before we get down focusing at his genitals. And as I said, we never know what to expect. Generally it will be hard to correctly anticipate the size and design of a penis (and scrotum) from the stature of a given man:

The same principle certainly then works vice versa! If you were encountering penises via glory-holes you can not assume the appearance of the owner, it´s even much catchier this way around!

Look for the owner here!

Look for the owner here!

If you are inclined to, do enjoy the sight and reaction of male genitals, whether via photos, artwork, video or for real, penises and scrotums remain to be eternally fascinating!